What Thomas' English Muffins Can Teach You About Non-Compete Agreements

A week or so ago, I came across a story in the legal press that reminded me of something I wish more of my clients would focus on: Non-Compete Agreements. The story was about a lawsuit filed against Chris Botticella, a former Senior VP of the company that owns Thomas’ English Muffins. It seems that Mr. Botticella had accepted a new position as a senior executive at Hostess, one of Thomas’ competitors in the baked goods space. Thomas’ sued to prevent him from taking the job, and won.

Why? Well, it seems that Botticella is one of only 7 people on the planet – yes, the planet – who knows the secret to how Thomas’ English Muffins are made. And Thomas’ certainly didn’t want him taking that knowledge to one of its biggest competitors. As a result of the court’s decision, my guess is that Botticella is going to have a tough time finding work as counter help at the corner bakery, much less as a senior executive at a large, national baked goods company.

How does a lawsuit over English Muffins relate to YOUR business? Simple:  your people are your greatest asset, and, when they leave, potentially your greatest liability. They literally have the power to make or break your business. Every business guru will tell you this, but then you’re left to your own devices to figure out what it all means, and how to protect your business’ reliance on this sometimes unpredictable asset.

Perhaps the most important way you can protect your business’ customer accounts, secrets, processes, plans, and the like from traveling to a competitor after the defection of a key employee is to require key employees to sign a well-crafted Non-Compete or Non-Solicitation Agreement.

A Non-Compete or Non-Solicitation Agreement will prevent your best sales executive (you know, the one whose accounts resulted in 68% of your gross income last year) from leaving your company for a competitor, and taking her business with her to boot. Additionally, if you’ve got any proprietary systems or technologies, it’s imperative that you protect them. Your competitors will likely pay top dollar to lure away your key sales executive, information systems guy, CEO, or key manufacturing process employee. The loss of such an employee (and your competitor’s gain of that employee) will be felt where it hurts the most:  your bottom line.  Equally as important, they are enforceable.  As recently as 5 weeks ago, Judge Richard D. Bennett of the United States District Court for the District of Maryland reaffirmed in TEKSystems, Inc. v. Bolton not only that a Non-Compete is enforceable if reasonable in scope, but also that it will be automatically extended for the period the employee is found to have been in breach. 

Do you have employees whose loss would or could have a devastating effect on your revenues or your business? If you do, or even if you’re not sure, feel free to give me a call or shoot me an email and we’ll discuss it. I’ll be happy to answer your questions and point you in the right direction. Free of charge. And with no obligation.  You can also read more about Non-Competition Agreements in our recently released Business Owner's Pocket Guide

In the next entry, I’ll be writing about some of the important provisions a Non-Compete or Non-Solicitation Agreement should contain, and the real effects of these agreements. Stay tuned.

The Handshake vs. the Written Contract

 

I may be a bit younger in years, but I can still recall when a “handshake and a promise” deal actually meant something. Perhaps some of my confidence in another’s word stems from my small-town Mississippi roots. Nonetheless, in today’s economy, your business will need a lot more than a handshake if you want to get paid. Luckily, only a few hours spent with a reputable attorney can present you with a sound contract based on solid terms and conditions, which will save you time, stress and money, should a client try and stiff you on down the line.

 

Without a mutually agreed upon legal contract in place, any terms agreed upon with a handshake are moot. Entering into a handshake agreement could put a business at risk for losing money not only in the original agreement but also in court fees for legal action against a deceitful client (unjust enrichment, quantum meruit, and the like).

 

Since we’re not in 1950’s southern Mississippi, and few millennials even know the meaning of such hospitality in business transactions, a good rule of thumb for any business is to ditch the handshake and ask for a signature acknowledging an ironclad contract, complete with terms and conditions. Those terms and conditions should include the most basic items such as:

  • Compensation and payment terms
  • Changes/ additional services
  • Emergency services
  • Reimbursable expenses
  • Provisions of default
  • Dispute resolution
  • Governing law

 

Legal considerations, as stated above, are extremely important to help ensure appropriate compensation for hard work. Some businesses believe that something in writing, though not in legal contract form, is just as dependable. The reality of the situation is a lack of clearly stated legal terms and conditions could leave a business with a higher level of risk for a transaction.

 

While developing long-standing relationships with clients is important, don’t forget to protect yourself and your business in the process. Shake your client’s hand and exchange the promise to fulfill the contract, but also take a couple of hours with your attorney to put a “gentleman’s agreement” into writing. For the most part, your company’s terms and conditions can and should be standard with every contract, so this will not be an ongoing legal expense. Rather, it will ensure you peace of mind in knowing that should an agreement not go as planned, you have a contract to protect your business. 

 

Contracting Basics: Why Boring Things Like Venue and Jurisdiction Matter

In the last 12 months, my firm helped our clients close transactions and manage litigation in Maryland, New York, New Jersey, Connecticut, Florida, Delaware, Pennsylvania, Virginia, Texas, and Washington State -- all from our sole office location in Hunt Valley, Maryland.    We're hardly alone. 


Today, geographic boundaries are becoming less and less relevant to businesses of every size and description.  With that globalization (or at least "Americanization") comes the uncertainty of collection.  It is interesting that in an era where electronic communication is so commonplace as to jeopardize the two century old institution that is the U.S. Postal Service, the written contract -- often complete with real, live signatures -- has if anything gained in importance.

This fact was brought home to me yet again when consulting with a client concerning her company's $20,000 claim for arising out of work performed for a North Carolina firm.  The Purchase Order described the work, named the price, and outlined the payment and delivery terms.  And while my client thought it was sufficient at the time, she now realizes that she has no chance to recoup her attorney's fees, will not realize any interest on the overdue payment, and worse yet, has to travel to North Carolina in order to chase her money.

Every contract.  Allow me to repeat...every contract...should state where suit (or arbitration) must be filed in the event of a dispute.  These provisions may be called "Dispute Resolution" or even the technical, legal terms of  "Venue" or "Jurisdiction."  However called, the language must not only provide which state law governs the contract, but also which courts will have "jurisdiction" or power of review over any claims.  Had this provision -- two sentences at most -- been present in my client's purchase order, her customer would have to come to her in order to defend the claim, rather than force my client to throw good money after bad traveling to her delinquent customer's home state.

Lesson learned.

(If you have a contract question...or horror story...send it in.  It may prove useful to others or just serve as a source of amusement in a Schedenfreud sort of way.)