Getting Married Before You Date

Yesterday at 5:00, I found myself sitting in our conference room across from a very interesting gentleman. He was in his upper fifties, maybe 60, and carried himself as a professional. He explained that he had been in business for upwards of 40 years – that he had made some big mistakes, learned from them, moved on, and built a fairly successful business. 

He told me that the business that he had started had run its course and he wanted to start a new one, having learned from the mistakes of the old. In order to start the company, he decided to bring in 3 additional people. These people were friends of his, experienced in his industry, and possessed of the skill sets necessary to make the new venture run. My visitor had decided to divide 40% of the stock among them, retaining 60% for himself – enough, he felt, to keep control of the company.

He was convinced that giving out shares of the company was the only way to keep the group motivated, absent money to pay each person’s going rate. My visitor was wrong.

Recently, I wrote a piece in our e-mail series discussing the mistake of offering partnership at the outset of a business relationship. And whether the discussion concerns true partnership or co-ownership of a corporation or LLC, the fact of the matter is that co-ownership is a business marriage. And make no mistake, just like the real thing, a business divorce can be expensive and emotionally draining. 

For his part, my prospective client was asking his friends to invest their time and skill in a new business for little or no compensation. What he wanted was a way to show his friends that they would reap the benefits of their investment.   We explored a number of possible solutions, but what we decided upon was offering stock options.

People, you see, are unpredictable. Some may be highly skilled and great friends, but start working together and it’s a trainwreck. Different business philosophies, work ethic, or personalities can destroy a team that could not possibly look better on paper.   Stock options and a vesting schedule are two ways to put together an arrangement now which takes effect later

In this case, we could commit to an option to purchase stock in the company beginning in 3 years, discounted for each year the person had been with the company. Moreover, as incentives, other discounts to the purchase price could also apply, provided we took care not to trigger any unwanted tax consequences.

In other words, my prospective client could date before he got married. And in my experience, that’s a pretty good plan.

Questions? Comments? Concerns? Raise it for discussion on Facebook, Twitter, or LinkedIn.

For more information on our free e-mail series, click here.

Contracting Basics: Why Boring Things Like Venue and Jurisdiction Matter

In the last 12 months, my firm helped our clients close transactions and manage litigation in Maryland, New York, New Jersey, Connecticut, Florida, Delaware, Pennsylvania, Virginia, Texas, and Washington State -- all from our sole office location in Hunt Valley, Maryland.    We're hardly alone. 


Today, geographic boundaries are becoming less and less relevant to businesses of every size and description.  With that globalization (or at least "Americanization") comes the uncertainty of collection.  It is interesting that in an era where electronic communication is so commonplace as to jeopardize the two century old institution that is the U.S. Postal Service, the written contract -- often complete with real, live signatures -- has if anything gained in importance.

This fact was brought home to me yet again when consulting with a client concerning her company's $20,000 claim for arising out of work performed for a North Carolina firm.  The Purchase Order described the work, named the price, and outlined the payment and delivery terms.  And while my client thought it was sufficient at the time, she now realizes that she has no chance to recoup her attorney's fees, will not realize any interest on the overdue payment, and worse yet, has to travel to North Carolina in order to chase her money.

Every contract.  Allow me to repeat...every contract...should state where suit (or arbitration) must be filed in the event of a dispute.  These provisions may be called "Dispute Resolution" or even the technical, legal terms of  "Venue" or "Jurisdiction."  However called, the language must not only provide which state law governs the contract, but also which courts will have "jurisdiction" or power of review over any claims.  Had this provision -- two sentences at most -- been present in my client's purchase order, her customer would have to come to her in order to defend the claim, rather than force my client to throw good money after bad traveling to her delinquent customer's home state.

Lesson learned.

(If you have a contract question...or horror story...send it in.  It may prove useful to others or just serve as a source of amusement in a Schedenfreud sort of way.)

 
Related Posts Plugin for
WordPress, Blogger...