Rule #1 Revisited
This past weekend, my wife and I stopped in at the Great Grapes Wine Festival at Oregon Ridge. Beautiful day, live music, smiling people all around, great gathering of Maryland wineries…what could be better? Only one thing to complain about as we entered the festival – the business analyst part of me wouldn’t shut up.
The voice started up when we walked up to buy our tickets -- $25 for each adult, $20 per child. Cash only.
Those of you who remember my post, Rule #1, will recall that I believe the first imperative in just about any endeavor is that you make it easy for people to do what you want them to do. Great Grapes wanted paid attendance; the more people, the better.
First Violation
Great Grapes had implemented a cash only policy in a card-centric world. How many people do you know who routinely carry $50 in cash? If you factor in payment for food, guests would need more cash than just the admission price. Equally as important, the policy seemed to come as a surprise to many of those walking up to purchase tickets to the festival. Some turned around and walked out.
Second Violation
There was one ATM machine on site. The machine charged a $3.50 service fee and was set at a $40 maximum cash outlay. Translation: If someone wanted cash for two tickets, he or she had to process two transactions, resulting in double the time spent at the machine and an irritating $7.00 total service fee. So now, Great Grapes had an increasingly long line of grumbling would-be patrons waiting to be robbed by the one ATM on site so they could comply with the irritatingly narrow ticket purchasing policy. (At least the festival served alcohol.)
Third Violation
Having made it past the ticket counter, we were directed to a tent where we could pick up our wine glasses. There were pre-printed signs along the table reading (as best I can recall):
“So you’re the jerk who dropped your glass. Instead of creating a scene, please just pay the $5 charge for an additional glass and try to drink responsibly.”
Now, I get that the festival shouldn’t have to replace broken wine glasses free of charge. But do you really want to alienate paying customers from whom you want repeat business at future festivals by assuming them to be drunken jerks…and then labeling them as such in pre-printed signs?
Make no mistake about it; we enjoyed our time at the festival, once the original irritation wore off. We sampled some new wines and even bought a few bottles to take home. Unfortunately, that’s when we unwittingly began the course of events leading us to observe the…
Fourth Violation
As we prepared to leave one of the tents with the 2 bottles we had just purchased, the cashier asked if we wanted to take the bottle with us or simply pick them up at will-call. Pleased that someone would hold them for us, we accepted our voucher and decided on will call. Two hours later, the clouds swept in.
Here’s the scene: The band was playing, looking out on the crowd under fairly blue skies. The crowd was looking back, over the bandstand, to the rather ominous looking clouds gathering above and behind the band. People began packing up; first a trickle, then a flood toward the exits. That’s when we discovered that there was one will-call tent for all the wineries at the festival. The tent was manned by severely overwhelmed staff ill-equipped to deal with a large crowd, now being soaked by a serious downpour. Rumors of coming “golf ball sized hail” (that never came) swept over the line, causing already wet people to become anxious.
The festival organizers had wanted people to view will-call as both a convenience and as another reason to patronize future festivals. Because it was organized in such a way that it was incapable of handling a closing-time exit (even if closing time came earlier because of the weather), it became yet another area of dissatisfaction.
Bottom Line: Each time the attendees touched the infrastructure of the festival, they came away unhappy. The sole reason for this dissatisfaction was the organizer’s failure, at each point of contact, to observe Rule #1. They clearly knew what they wanted people to do. The organizers understood, at each step of the way, what path they wanted patrons to take. They simply failed to make it easy, enjoyable, or memorable -- in a good way.
I’m wondering if they’ll do better next year. I may never know, of course, because I won’t be there to find out.
|
Want more information on Best Business Practices? Check these out: |
